Ralesk Ne’vennoyx (ralesk) wrote in lj_clients,
Ralesk Ne’vennoyx
ralesk
lj_clients

  • Mood:

ljKlient 0.0.4

Hi there!

I’m fairly new to this community, and haven’t even posted yet as far as I can remember, but here’s the deal.

I’ve been a Windows user for most of my modern-computer time, and I really really enjoy Semagic — however, I also like to spend time in Linux, more specifically in KDE, and I found that there are no Qt/KDE LiveJournal clients (well, there are but very few, and none of them in any of the distributions as far as I could see, and, most importantly, none of them are maintained).  I don’t personally like the feel of Gtk2/Gnome, so I prefer to avoid LogJam (although it is a quite well written piece, congratulations :D).  So in the end, I craved for some coding and decided to dig into the world of Qt and KDE for the first time of my life last Saturday.

Didn’t take me too long to decide to avoid C++ like plague for another while :D

So in the end… ljKlient was born, written in Python, a language I had known exactly nothing about a week ago.  I’m currently at a release where I believe that for the very basic uses, the software is useable and as such releasable: you can post with the current, local time, into your own journal, public, private or friends-only posts, allow or disallow comments, set a subject.

Check it out :)  Requires pyKDE (and as such, pyQt), and of course every dependency of that.

Subscribe

  • 302: lj_dev

    In the interests of consolidating all LiveJournal development-related discussion, we're going to be closing down this community. The same…

  • Plain text to LJ

    I have an old blog from xanga that's in html/plain text and I want to move it over here. Which client would be the best to do this? I also want to…

  • ljKlient 0.2.0 Preview Release 1

    Today marks another milestone in the development of ljKlient — as the first preview of the 0.2 series is released.  Please go to the project…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

  • 0 comments